91 freeway express lane single occupancy vehicle

The program in the San Francisco-Bay Area encompasses 600 miles of lanes.

They use variable pricing to raise and lower prices so the lanes are always free-flowing, even during peak travel periods.Īll three major metro areas in California have long-range plans for entire networks of express lanes. The only proven way to reduce freeway congestion is priced express lanes, which were pioneered 25 years ago on Orange County’s SR 91. As Orange County’s population continues to grow, the same will happen to new HOV lanes, like those on I-5 in South County. Most California HOV lanes fail to meet the federal standard of maintaining travel speeds of at least 45 miles per hour over 90 percent of rush hour travel periods. Experience has shown that carpool (HOV) lanes are not a sustainable solution. Since the vast majority of people depend on cars or buses for commuting, we need to reduce traffic congestion across Southern California.

The region had the worst traffic delays per auto commuter - 119 hours a year highest congestion costs per auto commuter - $2,440 a year most regional hours of traffic delays - 971 million hours per year and worst total direct costs of congestion (in wasted time and fuel) - $17.8 billion per year. The Los Angeles-Orange County metro area once again ranked worst, by a wide margin, in chronic freeway congestion in the Texas A&M Transportation Institute’s 2019 Urban Mobility Report. It’s a good question, and it deserves a thoughtful answer.įor context, let’s begin with some terrible numbers. So why should people have to “pay twice” to use them? Should recently built carpool lanes on I-5 in Orange County be converted to toll lanes?Ĭoncerns have been raised that these new lanes were paid for by Measure M2 sales tax money.

91 freeway express lane single occupancy vehicle